Monday, November 8, 2010

Essay #4 Topic Proposal

Brandy Bigler
November 8, 2010
Essay #4 Topic Proposal
Topic: The oppression of women’s rights in Atwood’s The Handmaids Tale.
The Republic of Gilead’s ground rules are based on biblical background which somehow justifies that women should have no rights and are only good for having children.
I want to learn more about why the women didn’t fight back to gain control of their own lives again.
The part of the book that confuses me is that, why didn’t anyone stand up and try to stop what was going on? Why did Atwood choose the heavy theme of women’s oppression as the base of the book?  Does the book reflect what Atwood believes should or will happen?
I plan to research Margaret Atwood’s biography and the topics of women’s oppression in the Handmaids Tale. Along with the biblical background that justifies The Republic of Gilead’s laws.
I chose this topic because I found it to be a very interesting part of the story.
I think it will help me to know why she wrote the book the way she did, and if it is based on her own beliefs.   
 

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Thesis Blog

Brandy Bigler
October 29, 2010
Thesis Blog

1. A
This thesis statement is weak because the author stated exactly what he or she would be talking about, and makes no claim.
2. A
This thesis is weak because it could possibly be considered an opinion and it stating a board statement.
3. B
This thesis statement is weak because it is restating a statement that most people know and consider to be true.
4. A
This thesis statement is weak because it is making no claim, it simply just states what the play is about, and there is no argument.
5. A
This thesis statement is weak because the author has stated his or her opinion.

Thesis:
            After reading The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien and knowing that he served in the Vietnam War, this could complicate his discussion of truth v. fiction in the text.

Questions:
I believe that my thesis statement is a strong thesis statement because it is an arguable statement. I know I will have evidence to prove my thesis correct from the text and my research but it is a statement I have to prove because anyone could agree or disagree with it. It is also a strong thesis statement because it is specific; it identifies exactly what my argument is for the paper. My thesis statement raises questions and is, as I said before, an arguable topic.  

Monday, October 18, 2010

Source Evaluation Blog

Brandy Bigler
October 24, 2010
Source Evaluation Blog

 

Naparsteck, Martin. "An Interview with Tim O'Brien." Contemporary Literature. VOL.32.          
         University of Wisconsin Press, 1991. 1-11. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1208335

            The source is an interview with Tim O’Brien. He is asked a serious of questions about the books he has written and talks a little bit about each of them and the meaning behind them. He goes into detail about the book The Things They Carried and talks about a story two from the book in detail. I think that this interview will be helpful to my writing in the 3rd essay because I am going to do it from a biography stand point of Tim O’Brien and I think this interview is a good way to find out what he was really thinking and how he felt when he wrote The Things They Carry.  I can use this source in my paper because it will help me to know if the stories are actually about what O’Brien experienced or exactly how he got to the inspiration for certain stories.

 

(Naparsteck), Tina Chen. ""Unraveling the Deeper Meaning": Exile and the Embodied Poetics of                Displacement in Tim O'Brien's "The Things They Carried"." Contemporary Literature.      
        VOL 39. University of Wisconsin Press, 1998. 77-98   http://www.jstor.org/stable/1208922

            This source is specifically talking about Tim O’Brien’s book The Things They Carried. It goes into great detail about the meaning behind his writing. I think that this source will be good to have for the paper as well as the other one. It lets me into Tim O’Brien’s world and why he wrote what he did. Both of these sources will work well together to give me the information that I need. I think that this source is credible because it is from a creditable site. It is a good source for me to have. It is not totally current but it doesn’t really need to be for my writing stand point.

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Mid-Session Check In

October 13, 2010



Dear Mrs. Darrow:

            In English 102 I felt that my biggest challenge was the essay on poetry. Poetry is not one of my strong suits nor do I really care for it. So I found it really hard to give it more full effort and attention. On the other hand my biggest success so far has been the readings. I can really get into them and understand them. I feel like I can grasp the concept of what the author is saying and give a detailed response to what our assignment is.
           I have found the readings to be very interesting so far. They are easy to follow and you can get into the story fairly easy. Reading The Sand Storm by Sean Huze and The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien has opened my eyes to what really happens in war. I felt that both authors did a good job of letting the reader into what a soldier goes through. However, when reading the poems I found myself having to concentrate harder but the poems opened my eyes to realize that I actually enjoy different types of literature.
            Literary analysis is something that I have never done before until this class. I found it to be very challenging for me. I think it is different because it seems like it takes more concentration. You actually have to think about what you read and how you are writing about it. Unlike other writing styles where you write your opinion and your paper is strictly about how you interpreted the story and your feelings on it. In English 101 I concentrated on persuasive, narrative, and research essays, literary analysis is totally different from all of those. In literary analysis there is a lot less of your opinion, it is more of your interpretation which has to be backed up with facts.    
            For the second part of this class I hope to improve my writing skills even more. My goal is to do my best and try to understand what I’ am reading and writing the best I can. I have already learned so much from this class in terms of writing. I can only hope that during the second part I will learn more and be able to apply my abilities to my assignments in and outside of this class as I have done so far.
Thank you


Sincerely,
Brandy Bigler

Thursday, September 30, 2010

Summary v. Analysis


Brandy Bigler
September 30, 2010
Summary v. Analysis Blog Post


            Tim O’Brien’s “On the Rainy River” is set in the summer of 1968. Tim O’Brien had just graduated from college and was ready to enter the real world. One month later, the real world found O’Brien, and on June 17, 1968 a draft notice for the Vietnam War arrived in the mail. O’Brien was not a supporter of the war in any way. Unfortunately, he was drafted for the war he hated and he felt as though he was too good for the war. The story describes how he spent his summer before entering the war. This is a story he claims to have never told anyone.
            As the story goes, O’Brien spent his summer working in a meat packing plant and would go home every night smelling like pig. In mid July, O’Brien starts to think about running to Canada. He didn’t know whether he should stay and fight in the war, or whether he should run from it. One morning O’Brien decides that he has had enough of waffling over his decision. He walks out of work, leaves a note for his parents, and starts driving north. He drives for hours until he becomes exhausted and decides to get off the road for a while. He pulls into a place called The Tip Top Lodge that sits along the Rainy River, which divides Canada from the US. He meets an elderly man, named Elroy, who owns the lodge. O’Brien stays at the Tip Top Lodge for six days and during those six days he spends most of the time with Elroy. On the sixth day Elroy and O’Brien take a boat out onto the Rainy River to go fishing. Once there, O’Brien looks from one shore to the other and realizes that he must face his fears and fight in the war. He cannot pull himself to actually make the decision and after twenty minutes Elroy tells him that the “fish ain’t biting today” (60). At that moment, Elroy becomes the hero of O’Brien’s life.
            In the story, O’Brien is a young kid just out of college who is faced almost immediately with a decision that kids of his age should never be faced with. He was not ready to make the decision for himself and he finds himself sitting on the Rainy River with a wise elderly man. On one side, he has the US and the Vietnam War. On the other he has Canada and a sense of freedom. He does not want to leave his life behind but he also does not want to go back and face his fate. The river in the story serves as the barrier of the decision he must make and equally as the symbol of his indecision. “…it occurred to me that at some point we must’ve passed into Canadian waters, across that dotted line between two different worlds, and I remember a sudden tightness in my chest as I looked up and watched the far shore come at me” (55). The river is a divider between what he has always known and a new, unknown, scary world. He is sitting at the point where he must make a decision but he cannot seem to make the decision for himself. He breaks down and cries because he is too young to make such a large decision. Elroy realized that O’Brien did not want to leave and simply made the decision for him by taking O’Brien back to the US shoreline. Elroy brought O’Brien “up against the realities” to choose life for himself. Ultimately Elroy made the decision for O’Brien when he noticed that O’Brien did not want to go, and this is why O’Brien considers him the hero of his life.



Work Cited
O’Brien, Tim. The Things They Carried. First Mariner Books, 2009. Print.


 

http://www.illyria.com/tob/tobbio.html